by Chuck Gallagher — business ethics keynote speaker and AI speaker and author
I was recently reflecting on a story that landed on my desk and lingered far beyond the article itself: a newly promoted leader discovers that their second-in-command—the person occupying the very role meant to support and amplify them—is quietly undermining their authority. That story, laid out in an essay for Inc., isn’t simply a management hiccup—it’s a moral fault line. Inc.com
Here’s what I mean: This isn’t about one rogue teammate misbehaving. It’s about how leadership, trust, structure, and ethics all collide when the chain of command fractures, and when the person you count on to have your back becomes the one working around you.
The Breach of Trust Behind the Title
Imagine being told you’re in charge. You accept that responsibility. You’re ready to guide, decide, protect your team. But then your second-in-command submits strategy documents behind your back. They ignore your request for fuller plans and quietly implement changes anyway. They’re talented; you want to leverage their strengths—but now, you don’t even trust them to tell you the truth.
That’s the situation described in the Inc piece: a leader who did not hire this person, whose role overlaps with the leader’s responsibilities, and who has access to the same boss as the leader. A combination poised for ethical breakdown from the moment it formed. Inc.com
From my perspective as a business ethics keynote speaker, the ethical damage here is profound. It isn’t simply about broken promises—it’s about the erosion of authority and the betrayal of shared purpose.
Why This Matters in an Ethical Leadership Context
- Authority is a moral asset.
Authority isn’t just “the power to ask”—it’s “the responsibility to be trusted.” When someone undermines you, they don’t just reduce your authority—they corrode the moral structure of your role. - The second-in-command role is a mirror.
When the person you rely on works around you rather than with you, the partnership is broken. That broken partnership sends a message to the rest of the team: “Leadership is optional.” And if leadership is optional, ethics becomes optional. - Structure without clarity invites chaos.
In the article’s scenario, overlapping roles, remote work, dual reporting lines—all contribute to ambiguity. Ambiguity breeds rationalization. And rationalization is the first step toward ethical compromise. - Trust is the true data point.
We often measure leadership success by output, growth, and deliverables. But when the metric is authority and trust, we must ask: “Does this leader feel trusted?” “Do they trust their team?” Without those answers, everything else is fragile.
What Leaders Must Do to Prevent This Fall-Out
- Own the assignment. If you’re assigned a second-in-command you didn’t hire, treat that as a prompt to clarify roles immediately. Make the conversation about alignment—not authority.
- Document the boundary. As the article advises, when someone sidesteps your request, document it. It’s not about catching them—it’s about protecting your ability to lead with integrity.
- Invite collaboration intentionally. Let your second know you want their ideas—and then set a structure for how those ideas will be shared, evaluated, and implemented. Make transparency the default.
- Ask the question: Who do we report to? When overlap exists, ambiguity rules. Clarify the chain of command. Set expectations. Reset the framework for responsibility.
- Treat the role as strategic, not just operational. Your second isn’t merely a deputy—they are a partner in ethical leadership. Evaluate them not just on deliverables, but on how they uphold your company’s values, culture, and integrity.
Final Thought
The article in Inc isn’t just a “story of management” — it’s a cautionary tale about ethics in leadership. When the person closest to you becomes misaligned, the ripple doesn’t stop with you—it disrupts your team, your culture, and your mission.
In my role as a business ethics keynote speaker, I’ve seen this scenario dozens of times—and it always comes down to one question: Are we aligned in purpose, or just paired in title?
Choose alignment. Because when you don’t, the failure doesn’t begin with a missed target—it begins with a lost opportunity to lead with integrity.
Related Articles:
Navigating the Ethical Leadership Landscape: Insights from an Ethics Consultant
Center for Leadership Ethics announced by University of Arizona
The Future Was Always Here: How Ethical Leadership Quietly Overtook the Bottom Line
